Tarheel Dems

archived: 4 - 10 Feb, 2007         Back                 Next

UPDATED: FEBRUARY 7, 2007

                        CONGRESSMAN JONES

Democrats in the US Senate cannot muster the 60 votes needed to pass their non-binding resolution against Bush’s escalation of the civil war in Iraq.  Democrats in the US House will take up a resolution next week.  Expect Democrats in the House to be successful.

North Carolina Republican Congressman Walter Jones, who opposed the war in Iraq, has his attention focused on Bush’s moves signaling a war with Iran.  Pat Buchanan, a conservative icon, observes: 

Bush's contempt for Congress is manifest and, frankly, justified.  

Asked if Congress could stop him from surging 21,500 troops into Iraq, Bush on 60 Minutes brushed aside Congress as irrelevant.  

"I fully understand [the Congress] could try to stop me from doing it. But I've made my decision. And we're going forward." Asked if he had sole authority "to put the troops in there no matter what the Congress wants to do," Bush replied, "In this situation I do, yeah."  

Is Congress then impotent, if it does not want war on Iran?  

Enter Rep. Walter Jones, Republican of North Carolina.  

The day after Bush's threat to Iran, Jones introduced a Joint Resolution, "Concerning the Use of Military Force by the United States Against Iran." Under HJR 14, "Absent a national emergency created by attack by Iran, or a demonstrably imminent attack by Iran, upon the United States, its territories, possessions, or its armed forces, the president shall consult with Congress, and receive specific authorization pursuant to law from Congress, prior to initiating any use of force on Iran."  

Jones' resolution further declares, "No provision of law enacted before the date of the enactment of this joint resolution shall be construed to authorize the use of military force by the United States against Iran."  

If we are going to war on Iran, Jones is saying, we must follow the Constitution and Congress must authorize it.  

If Biden, Kerry, Clinton, and Obama refuse to sign on to the Jones resolution, they will be silently conceding that Bush indeed does have the power to start a war on Iran. And America should pay no further attention to the Democrats' wailing about being misled on the Iraq war.

Buchanan has it right and so does Congressman Jones.  

                        DEMOCRATS RISING?  

Gallup has issued its 2006 study of voter partisanship in the United States.  It is a fascinating study, one well worth a complete reading.  Their summary (emphasis added): 

A review of Gallup polling data from 2006 underscores the relative strength the Democratic Party currently enjoys versus the Republican Party in American politics. For the year, Democrats averaged a nearly four point advantage over the Republicans on national party identification and an even larger 10-point advantage when independents' partisan "leanings" are taken into account. In an analysis of 2006 partisanship at the state level, 33 states show a statistically significant advantage in favor of the Democratic Party, six states show a statistically significant Republican advantage, and the remainder can be considered competitive. Democratic strength in the United States has grown in each of the last three years. The trends are fueled more by movement away from the Republican Party and into independent status than by movement toward the Democratic Party.

For North Carolina Democrats, the news also appears good.  Gallup ranks states as Republican, Competitive or Democratic.  Their findings show North Carolina with a statistically significant Democratic identification edge and one of six states (highlighted below) moving from “competitive” to Democratic. 

Party Advantage in U.S. States
Recent Years

State

1993

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

Alabama

Dem.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Arizona

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Dem.

Arkansas

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

California

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Colorado

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Connecticut

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Delaware

Dem.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

District of Columbia

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Florida

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Georgia

Dem.

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Idaho

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Illinois

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Indiana

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Dem.

Iowa

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Kansas

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Kentucky

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Louisiana

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Maine

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Rep.

Dem.

Dem.

Maryland

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Massachusetts

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Michigan

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Minnesota

Dem.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Mississippi

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Missouri

Dem.

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Montana

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Nebraska

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Nevada

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Rep.

Dem.

Dem.

New Hampshire

Comp.

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

New Jersey

Comp.

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

New Mexico

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

New York

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

North Carolina

Dem.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

North Dakota

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Ohio

Dem.

Rep.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Oklahoma

Dem.

Comp.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Oregon

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Pennsylvania

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Rhode Island

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

South Carolina

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

South Dakota

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Tennessee

Dem.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Comp.

Comp.

Texas

Dem.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Utah

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Vermont

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Virginia

Comp.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Comp.

Dem.

Washington

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

West Virginia

Dem.

Dem.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Wisconsin

Dem.

Comp.

Comp.

Dem.

Dem.

Dem.

Wyoming

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

Rep.

The table immediately below provides the numbers to support Gallup’s conclusions: 

Partisanship in U.S. States
Gallup Polls, 2006

State

Dem./
Lean Dem.

Ind.
(no lean)

Rep./
Lean Rep.

Dem. -
Rep.

Adv

Class-
ification

 

%

%

%

 

 

Rhode Island

66

8

26

40

Dem.

Vermont

64

9

27

37

Dem.

Massachusetts

63

8

29

34

Dem.

Connecticut

61

11

29

32

Dem.

Arkansas

60

6

34

26

Dem.

Maine

58

10

32

26

Dem.

New York

58

8

34

24

Dem.

West Virginia

58

8

34

24

Dem.

Maryland

58

7

35

23

Dem.

New Hampshire

55

12

33

22

Dem.

Missouri

55

8

37

18

Dem.

Washington

54

10

36

18

Dem.

Michigan

52

11

37

15

Dem.

Ohio

53

8

39

15

Dem.

New Jersey

52

10

38

14

Dem.

Illinois

52

9

39

13

Dem.

Kentucky

54

6

41

13

Dem.

New Mexico

54

5

41

13

Dem.

Minnesota

53